Discussion - Verizon reps keep customer on most expensive plan despite multiple requests to make things right

Read Full Article…
Join the discussion
Scorpion80
Scorpion80
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago
↵Mafia said:

Ill add to this i work for Verizon and everything you said here is true

Wait, so if you arent the one who sold a customer a line on a rate plan and a customer requests you remove it or change it, then you literally receive a charge back on your own commission statement? Because thats what the author is indicating. A carrier cant financially charge back something they never paid you.

Like
Quote
Scorpion80
Scorpion80
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago
↵ladyshaw0698 said:

Sorry, this article is spot on. Not only did ALL this happen to me with my business account. The main issue after becoming a customer is customer service. The customer service is unnecessarily complicated to navigate, and business customer service is only open during business hours, as a business owner I do not have the time to sit on the phone multiple times for over and hour, just to get fake assistance. I finally had to just close out my account. They also didn't tell me they were running my personal credit and it would be a hard pull. The experience was absolutely ridiculous. And it is coming directly from corporate.


My service didn't work in my home and they tried to sale me wifi in order to use their service in my home, although I had unlimited plans, the wifi router was another $45, But I was already paying $89 for service I wasn't receiving. Makes no sense that my phone didn't work, but the router did. Straight scam. And you won't care until it happens to you.


Not to mention I could never correct anything in the app, because with new service, nothing shows for 2 billing cycles, until you create a history. Verizon has definitely stooped as low as to scam their customers. And I just pray people leave and refuse to take that mistreatment lightly, like I did.

Not telling you theyre running your credit for hard pull is really grounds to be upset. Placing a freeze on your credit is a good way to protect yourself.

Like
Quote
BodomSlayer
BodomSlayer
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago
↵Jwizz said:

This is the dumbest article I've ever read. Why would you even rely on incompetent reps to do this basic account maintenance work in the first place? You should have created your account online to begin with. This never would have happened in that case. Switch to US mobile. I just switched a couple days ago from Verizon, and could not be happier. Both lines ported over easily. A hiccup with Samsung watch ultra not being compatible with included companion plan, but still saving 2200 a year even with the additional 10/ month work around watch plan

Bingo. For someone who claims to be a two decade veteran in the mobile field there are much faster resolutions, including on the website and the app.

This feels highly sensationalized.

Like
1
Quote
Brewski
Brewski
Arena Master
• 1mo ago
↵Scorpion80 said:


Which network does Straight Talk use? I will just let you look into that :)

Verizon

Like
1
Quote
Brewski
Brewski
Arena Master
• 1mo ago
↵Scorpion80 said:

Wait, so if you arent the one who sold a customer a line on a rate plan and a customer requests you remove it or change it, then you literally receive a charge back on your own commission statement? Because thats what the author is indicating. A carrier cant financially charge back something they never paid you.

That seems to be what the author is saying. Rep #1 activates highest plan to get best commission. And then any Rep #2, #3, after him who demotes the plan will be the one to take the hit in pay, so nobody wants to do it. Not sure if that is true...

Like
Quote
Fedupwithsystum
Fedupwithsystum
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

Dear "Customers",

Thank you for becoming a source of income that is making our CEO and stockholders an unprecedented amount of money. In order for us to accept you as a customer you will need to sign the user agreement which allows you the priveledge to communicate. If you do not sign this 20 page agreement (all small writing legal jargon designed to confuse and frustrate) good luck, as we cannot allow you to become a customer. This document covers such things as our limited liability. We can sell your data to anyone we want and we harvest it with reckless abandon. All the added goodies on your phone that you do not want or need, they allow us to harvest it all. This agreements talks about our partners, one of them being law enforcement. Oh, and by the way, they are one of our biggest customers buying your data. Who knew that YOUR 4th amendment right, the right to be free from the intrusion by government would be so lucrative to launder and sell. To make this agreement worth your while, we are offering you services that many were developed by grants and other funding that you paid for with your tax dollars. So, to reiterate, if you dont agree, good luck elsewhere, if you do agree, bend over. The technology, some developed with your money, will be sold to you for top dollar. We will harvest your personal information, then sell it in the very lucrative invasion of privacy and launder civil liberties markets. Should you need a phone that follows the same business model, they have secret backdoors due to the agreement made with the government when we accepted the "grants". This is all very legal thanks to your legislative body, called Congress. They work for special interest and outside others. Have a great day.

Like
1
Quote
Fedupwithsystum
Fedupwithsystum
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago
↵carlb said:

What has happened is typical for any of the big three. T mobile used to be different but not any more.


And customer service replaced by AI bots and the incredible mess and frustration it causes - at least nine out of ten big companies do that.and because everyone does it customers have no choice and have to endure this.

If we united we could make them change

Like
Quote
Scorpion80
Scorpion80
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago
↵Brewski said:

That seems to be what the author is saying. Rep #1 activates highest plan to get best commission. And then any Rep #2, #3, after him who demotes the plan will be the one to take the hit in pay, so nobody wants to do it. Not sure if that is true...

That cant be true from a raw pay perspective at a corporate store. That would trigger a landslide of litigation from the employee and customer side. But it could be true from a metric standpoint and if theres a team based pay multiplier then the team takes a bonus hit. With that said, placing a customer in a rate plan outside their comfort zone will just result in chargebacks, bad customer satisfaction results, and damaged trust.

Like
1
Quote
Scorpion80
Scorpion80
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago
↵AlanFriedman said:

Did you tell AI that I've written countless articles about similar situations involving non-related customers?

And within those countless articles, you advanced claims which were factually wrong and improperly demonized an entire industry of retail professionals. Should the other person " tell AI that?

Like
Quote
Reynaldo
Reynaldo
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

Hello.


I'm a Verizon Field Representative in New York, and even though you are right that the general structure of a sales rep is designed so that the more expensive plans generate the more commissions, Verizon is very transparent with the customer and before placing any order there is a lot of verification and review links sent to the customer that they have to complete and review before authorizing the order, so maybe your son didn't pay attention to this. I'm not excusing the agent that sold that to your son, he didn't do the right thing to begin with, but a lot of us try to be honest and we deal with a lot of rejection and bad publicity because of this. Customer is equally responsible for understanding what they are signing up for before placing any order. Verizon is very transparent in that respect and allow the customer to view all of this from their phone or email while the order is being created.


Please stop playing the victim and take responsibility as well. Yes the agent that sold you was greedy and not transparent but you are not telling the full story, you were very naive for signing up to something you didn't understand.

Like
2
Quote