A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
New accounts created within the last 24 hours may experience restrictions on how frequently they can
post or comment.
These limits are in place as a precaution and will automatically lift.
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.
Samsung and other Chinese OEMs already had this in their parts bins. Apple only came along and said what parts they wanted. Not that they had any choice; it was always iPad aspect or bust. Apple also copied the original LG smartwatch, put a crown on it and called it "all-new."
Since samsung already had a premier version I believe it's actually the reverse. The premier version was what I would call a careful experimental version with more attention given to the body than the screen itself. Maybe this was because of the failed attempts by other manufacturers like the Apple Communicator. This one however has the trendy, modern, and sleek look that makes you forget the starting price and that's what a definitive device does.
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.
How is it not obvious that Samsung only adopted the wider aspect ratio after Apple’s plans leaked? They released seven generations of foldables and even a tri-fold, yet they never went wide until Apple decided to. It’s the same pattern as the Watch Ultra or their previous design choices meant to compete with the iPhone. You can make all the excuses you want, but the facts are clear: when Apple pivots, Samsung follows suit. Anyone can see it.
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.
Samsung and other Chinese OEMs already had this in their parts bins. Apple only came along and said what parts they wanted. Not that they had any choice; it was always iPad aspect or bust. Apple also copied the original LG smartwatch, put a crown on it and called it "all-new."
The more you know. 🤷♀️
Since samsung already had a premier version I believe it's actually the reverse. The premier version was what I would call a careful experimental version with more attention given to the body than the screen itself. Maybe this was because of the failed attempts by other manufacturers like the Apple Communicator. This one however has the trendy, modern, and sleek look that makes you forget the starting price and that's what a definitive device does.
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.
How is it not obvious that Samsung only adopted the wider aspect ratio after Apple’s plans leaked? They released seven generations of foldables and even a tri-fold, yet they never went wide until Apple decided to. It’s the same pattern as the Watch Ultra or their previous design choices meant to compete with the iPhone. You can make all the excuses you want, but the facts are clear: when Apple pivots, Samsung follows suit. Anyone can see it.
Samsung should really be thanking Apple for this success. It’s a fact that if Apple hadn't signaled they were working on a book-style foldable, Samsung never would have adopted this wider aspect ratio. Despite releasing seven previous generations of foldables, Samsung avoided this design until Apple’s plans leaked—much like how they copied the Ultra watch and the edge trend to compete with the iPhone air. Once again, you're welcome, Samsung.