A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
New accounts created within the last 24 hours may experience restrictions on how frequently they can
post or comment.
These limits are in place as a precaution and will automatically lift.
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
WOW!!!! Usually with these comparisons I'll like one phone for some and another for others but Huawei dominated this! The only thing I like better was portraits on the iPhone but everything else, WOW! I would LOVE to see a comparison between the Vivo 300X and Xiaomi Ultra 17 Leica Edition and Huawei. Huawei has always had the best low light photography, but this is just wild.
I have the Mate XT and the Vivo X300 Ultra, and it's hard to say. The XT (which is now almost two years old) looks more "natural" in very low light. The Vivo has a little bit of a "yellow" tone to it. They both allow me to read the bottles in my bathroom if the writing is large.
When I go into almost NO light (my coat closet) they are both very dark, but with Huawei, you can see the outlines of the coats, but no patterns. With Vivo it is a completely black photo other than the slight light reflection from lightleak around the door that reflects off the clothes rack that I was using as my edge point for both photos.
So for my completely unscientific approach, the Pura 90 Pro Max should most definitely be the best at low light photography if their almost 2 year old phone is still beating the vivo x300 Ultra.
As an aside, for the Xiaomi Ultra 17 Leica edition, I can't do a fair comparison because I have the cracked glass on the back, but for the closet with almost no light it does better than the Vivo, but in low light (the bathroom) does worse than the Vivo.
This is a fun game. Thanks for the comment to lead me on this journey.
I admit that Huawei can draw a parity or even hold a slight advantage to Vivo X300 Ultra when shooting in low light conditions USING ITS MAIN CAMERA, as this is evident from a couple of review videos I viewed in Chinese TikTok.
Nevertheless, when low light shooting tests are conducted using ultrawide cameras, Huawei/Oppo/Honor/Xiaomi flagships will all be blown out of the water by Vivo X300 Ultra because they (or mainstream cameraphones) use much much smaller ultrawide sensors (something from 1/2"-1/2.78") compared with Vivo X300U (which utilizes a massive 1/1.28" Sony LYT-818 sensor), and the advantage Vivo holds in the respect is nothing but significant!
That's probably the biggest reason why I prefer Vivo flagships to other cameraphones because I just cannot accept the fact that one of the lenses in the camera system comes out crippled which prevents me from getting satisfactory results in certain focal lengths and light conditions. 😰
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
Also good at spying on us.... don't forget to give credit where it is due. haha
Also good at spying on us.... don't forget to give credit where it is due. haha
iPhones take terrible photos at night—they're even worse than Samsung phones.
I trust Huawei more than Google
WOW!!!! Usually with these comparisons I'll like one phone for some and another for others but Huawei dominated this! The only thing I like better was portraits on the iPhone but everything else, WOW! I would LOVE to see a comparison between the Vivo 300X and Xiaomi Ultra 17 Leica Edition and Huawei. Huawei has always had the best low light photography, but this is just wild.
Correction - I reckon Vivo has the best low light photography, especially the huge ultrawide on X200U/X300U is ABSOLUTELY HUGE and UNCOMPARABLE!
I have the Mate XT and the Vivo X300 Ultra, and it's hard to say. The XT (which is now almost two years old) looks more "natural" in very low light. The Vivo has a little bit of a "yellow" tone to it. They both allow me to read the bottles in my bathroom if the writing is large.
When I go into almost NO light (my coat closet) they are both very dark, but with Huawei, you can see the outlines of the coats, but no patterns. With Vivo it is a completely black photo other than the slight light reflection from lightleak around the door that reflects off the clothes rack that I was using as my edge point for both photos.
So for my completely unscientific approach, the Pura 90 Pro Max should most definitely be the best at low light photography if their almost 2 year old phone is still beating the vivo x300 Ultra.
As an aside, for the Xiaomi Ultra 17 Leica edition, I can't do a fair comparison because I have the cracked glass on the back, but for the closet with almost no light it does better than the Vivo, but in low light (the bathroom) does worse than the Vivo.
This is a fun game. Thanks for the comment to lead me on this journey.
I admit that Huawei can draw a parity or even hold a slight advantage to Vivo X300 Ultra when shooting in low light conditions USING ITS MAIN CAMERA, as this is evident from a couple of review videos I viewed in Chinese TikTok.
Nevertheless, when low light shooting tests are conducted using ultrawide cameras, Huawei/Oppo/Honor/Xiaomi flagships will all be blown out of the water by Vivo X300 Ultra because they (or mainstream cameraphones) use much much smaller ultrawide sensors (something from 1/2"-1/2.78") compared with Vivo X300U (which utilizes a massive 1/1.28" Sony LYT-818 sensor), and the advantage Vivo holds in the respect is nothing but significant!
That's probably the biggest reason why I prefer Vivo flagships to other cameraphones because I just cannot accept the fact that one of the lenses in the camera system comes out crippled which prevents me from getting satisfactory results in certain focal lengths and light conditions. 😰