A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
New accounts created within the last 24 hours may experience restrictions on how frequently they can
post or comment.
These limits are in place as a precaution and will automatically lift.
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
To be fair, though, saying that Apple always secures the latest top-tier display technology is a bit misleading. Apple kept 60Hz panels on its non-Pro iPhones for many years, while competitors such as Google were incorporating 90Hz and 120Hz displays into mainstream devices well before Apple brought higher refresh rates to its standard lineup.
Apple certainly tends to focus on refining and optimizing technologies before adopting them broadly, but that isn't the same thing as being first to market with the latest display innovations. Historically, Android manufacturers have often introduced features such as high-refresh-rate displays, LTPO technology, always-on displays, and other screen advancements before Apple eventually incorporated them into the iPhone ecosystem.
People are definitely interested in the foldable iPhone, just like I’ve been saying. Also, did you put a decent case on that Pixel 11 Fold? You’d better, because if you drop it, it’s going to shatter—that thing bends more than Beckham.
Yeah, people will ENJOY going in debt for a $2,000 dollar phone. Hey, their debt, not mine! Personally, I have no desire for a folding phone. Coworker had a fold 7, played around with it, just didn't see the "need" other than the cool factor. To me, that wasn't worth spending the money.
Take the Always-On Display (AOD). While Samsung and other manufacturers had it for years, Apple’s eventual implementation on the iPhone was so refined—especially in how they integrated features like Live Activities—that even Samsung adjusted their own approach to match. Apple’s strength lies in taking existing concepts and polishing them into a cohesive, highly functional experience rather than just winning the race to be first. Samsung added live activities to AOD after apple did. This is my point i never said apple was first or last i said apple perfects things. Before apple put out widgets google left them for dead.
It is disappointing to see Google raise prices while offering less RAM and settling for older display technology. Yet again, Apple secures the latest, top-tier display tech while Google falls behind—it feels like the same old story.
I only buy top-tier devices, so I’m excluding the non-Pro models from this conversation. When it comes to flagship phones, Apple consistently secures the best components available. Look at the M14 display: Apple adopted it starting with the iPhone 15, while Samsung didn't even bring that same tech to the S26 Ultra until much later. It’s wild to see how that gap plays out.
If the Pro Max and S26 Ultra are worth $1,300, then foldables are certainly worth the $2,000 price tag. I’ve converted to foldables, and I can't imagine ever going back to a standard candy bar phone. Now people afford what they can work hard play harder.
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
Yep, pretty excited for the Duo.
To be fair, though, saying that Apple always secures the latest top-tier display technology is a bit misleading. Apple kept 60Hz panels on its non-Pro iPhones for many years, while competitors such as Google were incorporating 90Hz and 120Hz displays into mainstream devices well before Apple brought higher refresh rates to its standard lineup.
Apple certainly tends to focus on refining and optimizing technologies before adopting them broadly, but that isn't the same thing as being first to market with the latest display innovations. Historically, Android manufacturers have often introduced features such as high-refresh-rate displays, LTPO technology, always-on displays, and other screen advancements before Apple eventually incorporated them into the iPhone ecosystem.
People are definitely interested in the foldable iPhone, just like I’ve been saying. Also, did you put a decent case on that Pixel 11 Fold? You’d better, because if you drop it, it’s going to shatter—that thing bends more than Beckham.
Yeah, people will ENJOY going in debt for a $2,000 dollar phone. Hey, their debt, not mine! Personally, I have no desire for a folding phone. Coworker had a fold 7, played around with it, just didn't see the "need" other than the cool factor. To me, that wasn't worth spending the money.
Take the Always-On Display (AOD). While Samsung and other manufacturers had it for years, Apple’s eventual implementation on the iPhone was so refined—especially in how they integrated features like Live Activities—that even Samsung adjusted their own approach to match. Apple’s strength lies in taking existing concepts and polishing them into a cohesive, highly functional experience rather than just winning the race to be first. Samsung added live activities to AOD after apple did. This is my point i never said apple was first or last i said apple perfects things. Before apple put out widgets google left them for dead.
It is disappointing to see Google raise prices while offering less RAM and settling for older display technology. Yet again, Apple secures the latest, top-tier display tech while Google falls behind—it feels like the same old story.
I only buy top-tier devices, so I’m excluding the non-Pro models from this conversation. When it comes to flagship phones, Apple consistently secures the best components available. Look at the M14 display: Apple adopted it starting with the iPhone 15, while Samsung didn't even bring that same tech to the S26 Ultra until much later. It’s wild to see how that gap plays out.
Not as disappointing as Apple in every iPhone release which btw, the demand for the new iPhone is very weak. Want some 🧀 with that whine?
If the Pro Max and S26 Ultra are worth $1,300, then foldables are certainly worth the $2,000 price tag. I’ve converted to foldables, and I can't imagine ever going back to a standard candy bar phone. Now people afford what they can work hard play harder.