A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
New accounts created within the last 24 hours may experience restrictions on how frequently they can
post or comment.
These limits are in place as a precaution and will automatically lift.
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
I would be happy with an S27 Ultra powered by a reliable, energy efficient and reasonably powerful Exynos. This uneducated marketing driven obsession with faster processors is just plain ridiculous. With the exception of those rare power users/gamers, you just dont need that much processing power.
I can't remember how long it's been since I thought "Wow, this processor can't keep up." Does anybody really need a Snapdragon 6? Does anybody really need a Galaxy S27?
Well let's see. Given that the vast majority of smartphones sold are not flagship phones and aren't powered by flagship SOCs, and not every flagship phones sold are being used for high computational applications or very high end graphic games, logic favors my comment. Can you prove me wrong or present a counter argument or are you just looking to pick a fight?
"Can you prove me wrong or present a counter argument or are you just looking to pick a fight?"
Defensive much? Just because someone asks you to back your comment to ensure you're not making a statement based on your personal beliefs or experience doesn't mean they're trying to pick a fight. Piggybacking on what I said about comments solely based on personal beliefs...
"and not every flagship phones sold are being used for high computational applications or very high end graphic games"
Again, what survey have you conducted to come up with this conclusion? Here's how I do it: I actually go outside & touch grass in many different settings (airports, coffee shops, amusement parks, places with waiting rooms, etc.) & do you know what I see people of all different varieties doing? Gaming, doing things that actually do require a good amount of processing power or just random browsing.
Sorry if you took offense at my reply. My real world experiance is just the opposite as yours so basically neither one of us has run a scientific survey and therefore only are stating our opinions. It would be interesting to see one. Pixel phones for instance are very popular in the US and they have significantly less gaming chops that Snapdragon based phones yet many still game on them. I do all of my gaming on an Tab S10+ which has much less HP than my S25 Ultra with no performance issues at all. I have my S25 Ultra's Snapdragon limited to medium performance (via settings) and is still lightning fast for browsing, streaming Ultra high quality music streams on Android Auto, etc. As a retired computer engineer I look at things a bit different. From a technical standpoint, SOC gaming processing power requirements are proportional to things like refresh rates, screen pixal density, graphics rendering complexity, etc. A game running at 4k on a 27" screen at 240 Hz refresh requires exponentially more power than a 6.9" screen running lower resolution at lower refresh rates. I would love someone like Phonearena do a blind survey of a popular game running on different performance level SOC equipped phones to see if people could see a meaningful playability difference and ideidentify which was which. Until then both of our opinions will remain just that, opinions.
I've noticed in your past comments that you've stated (& please forgive me for misquoting due to it not being in every comment of yours) that you don't take a lot of pictures & aren't really a power user. If that's the case, plus you having a Tab to game on vs your phone & if you don't use the S-Pen, what made you get the Ultra as opposed to the +?
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
I would be happy with an S27 Ultra powered by a reliable, energy efficient and reasonably powerful Exynos. This uneducated marketing driven obsession with faster processors is just plain ridiculous. With the exception of those rare power users/gamers, you just dont need that much processing power.
I can't remember how long it's been since I thought "Wow, this processor can't keep up." Does anybody really need a Snapdragon 6? Does anybody really need a Galaxy S27?
Oh yeah...the AI companies do.
"With the exception of those rare power users/gamers, you just dont need that much processing power."
Based on what? And what survey have you conducted to know that the amount of power users & gamers who use smartphones is "rare"?
Well let's see. Given that the vast majority of smartphones sold are not flagship phones and aren't powered by flagship SOCs, and not every flagship phones sold are being used for high computational applications or very high end graphic games, logic favors my comment. Can you prove me wrong or present a counter argument or are you just looking to pick a fight?
"Can you prove me wrong or present a counter argument or are you just looking to pick a fight?"
Defensive much? Just because someone asks you to back your comment to ensure you're not making a statement based on your personal beliefs or experience doesn't mean they're trying to pick a fight. Piggybacking on what I said about comments solely based on personal beliefs...
"and not every flagship phones sold are being used for high computational applications or very high end graphic games"
Again, what survey have you conducted to come up with this conclusion? Here's how I do it: I actually go outside & touch grass in many different settings (airports, coffee shops, amusement parks, places with waiting rooms, etc.) & do you know what I see people of all different varieties doing? Gaming, doing things that actually do require a good amount of processing power or just random browsing.
There's your counter argument.
Sorry if you took offense at my reply. My real world experiance is just the opposite as yours so basically neither one of us has run a scientific survey and therefore only are stating our opinions. It would be interesting to see one. Pixel phones for instance are very popular in the US and they have significantly less gaming chops that Snapdragon based phones yet many still game on them. I do all of my gaming on an Tab S10+ which has much less HP than my S25 Ultra with no performance issues at all. I have my S25 Ultra's Snapdragon limited to medium performance (via settings) and is still lightning fast for browsing, streaming Ultra high quality music streams on Android Auto, etc. As a retired computer engineer I look at things a bit different. From a technical standpoint, SOC gaming processing power requirements are proportional to things like refresh rates, screen pixal density, graphics rendering complexity, etc. A game running at 4k on a 27" screen at 240 Hz refresh requires exponentially more power than a 6.9" screen running lower resolution at lower refresh rates. I would love someone like Phonearena do a blind survey of a popular game running on different performance level SOC equipped phones to see if people could see a meaningful playability difference and ideidentify which was which. Until then both of our opinions will remain just that, opinions.
I've noticed in your past comments that you've stated (& please forgive me for misquoting due to it not being in every comment of yours) that you don't take a lot of pictures & aren't really a power user. If that's the case, plus you having a Tab to game on vs your phone & if you don't use the S-Pen, what made you get the Ultra as opposed to the +?