Discussion - T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon need to be schooled by Starlink and I've got my popcorn

Read Full Article…
Join the discussion
Thjr13
Thjr13
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

I'm not sure what the whole point of your opinion is. First off, there is no "monopoly", there are 3 major operators. Secondly if the satellite services doesn't save me any money I don't care. Lastly, if a tower has a problem it can be fixed relatively quick while a satellite hit by space debris is going to take more time to service/replace. I truly don't see any benefit to the satellite service unless you happen to be in a very remote area. I had satellite service with T-Mobile on the beta and only twice did I ever need it and it was in an area I was traveling thru at 80 mph. I have cancelled the extra fee for the service as it doesn't give me any personal value.

Like
Quote
mindovrmatter
mindovrmatter
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

I have had an ATT or a Verizon account for over 20 years. Never have I ever had such bad service as in recent years. Relocating now to another state for the rest of my retirement, I hope Starlink is the answer for my 5 phones, 3 tablets.

Like
Quote
phantomstar
phantomstar
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

More competition the better, hope Starlink is successful as it's always better to have more options than less.

Like
Quote
Connectivity1
Connectivity1
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

Low earth orbit satellite has its place. There are lots of rural and coverage gap situations where it is a viable solution. But the " traditional infrastructure" you reference is fiber optics, and the whole world runs on it... From your home wifi, to cell towers, to every connected device in the world of any type. I don't foresee satellite ever being a viable, direct medium replacement for glass. One strand of glass has more capacity than the current total bandwidth of all those satellites in orbit. Satellite communication wouldn't exist without fiber and is the very foundation which makes it( and cellular) possible. LEO SAT has its applications, but it will never go toe to toe. The big 3 will monetize the pipe they provide very soon, and I would expect continued movement into that space to squeeze newcomers, along with the purchase of prized spectrum.

Like
Quote
Spaceforce
Spaceforce
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

Starlink needs to buy one of the three carrier, mostly T Mobile for their market share and then launch Starlink as an extra subscription when needed.

Like
Quote
wartiger
wartiger
Arena Apprentice
• 1mo ago

It’s clear not many understand how RF or uplink and downlink takes place in the wireless world. Phones today simply don’t have enough power in the handsets to complete lengthy transmissions in comparison to the bag phone days. The sheer amount of data utilized in today’s world is spread across many different frequency bands, these companies purchased the space via FCC auctions. There is an entire host of routing tables that tie trunking, let’s not even begin on the 911 call routing. It certainly can enhance the customers experience when traveling or encountering a dead spot. The issue is most dead spots for RF will also be impacted for satcom, for peak service you need clear sky. The wireless carriers have high frequency bands in the millimeter waves that has to operate in much closer proximity, this is what true 5g speeds are. There are also a host of DAS systems and small cell systems that feeds your stores, malls, stadiums, campuses, and hospitals. Cell networks aren’t going anywhere


Like
Quote